Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro, having a overall score of 81.1 against 77. These phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version and Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 version. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better device than the Honor 50 Pro, it must be told that it's also an older, thicker and heavier device.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a quite greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a bit higher 1236 x 2676px resolution. Honor 50 Pro has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Honor 50 Pro feature very similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a lot worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, they both have a same size aperture. Honor 50 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features longer battery performance than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.