Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2676 x 1236 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 440 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting a global score of 79 against 77. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S design is older, heavier and thicker than Honor 50 Pro. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide you all the same operating system features.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Honor 50 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Honor 50 Pro also has a quite higher screen pixel density and a quite better 1236 x 2676 resolution.
Honor 50 Pro features a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Honor 50 Pro has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with better battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.