Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than the Honor 50 SE, getting a global score of 82 against 73.7. The iPhone XR design is much older, a bit thicker and just a little heavier than Honor 50 SE. IPhone XR has a bit superior processing unit than Honor 50 SE, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
IPhone XR counts with a little sharper screen than Honor 50 SE, although it has a just a little inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, a way worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display. Honor 50 SE has a better camera than iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Honor 50 SE has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Honor 50 SE has better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.