Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is much better than the Honor 50 SE's score of 73.7. Even though iPhone XS is notably older than the Honor 50 SE, it's body is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. IPhone XS has a much better looking display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel amount in each display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
The Honor 50 SE has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The iPhone XS counts with just a bit better performance than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Honor 50 SE has a way better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 50 percent more battery size. Honor 50 SE features a better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.