Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Honor 50 SE's 73.7 score. Even though the Google Pixel is incredibly older and just a bit thicker than the Honor 50 SE, it's construction is still noticeably lighter. The Google Pixel has a bit better screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the Honor 50 SE one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage. Honor 50 SE features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Honor 50 SE features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Honor 50 SE shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Honor 50 SE also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light situations and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.