Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Honor 50 SE, with an 80 score against 73.7. Google Pixel 3 is a noticeably lighter phone than the Honor 50 SE, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Honor 50 SE has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor 50 SE also has 4 GB more RAM. The Honor 50 SE has a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity. Honor 50 SE takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a way higher resolution camera.
The Honor 50 SE features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.