Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is slightly better than Honor 50 SE, getting a overall score of 80.7 against 73.7. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction has the same thickness than the Honor 50 SE, but it's just a little lighter. Honor 50 SE counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 SE also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better looking display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Honor 50 SE takes greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Honor 50 SE counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Honor 50 SE counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.