Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is better than Honor 50 SE's global score of 73.7. Google Pixel 4's construction is somewhat lighter than the Honor 50 SE, although it's a little bit thicker and was released just a little further than a year before. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better performance than Honor 50 SE, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Honor 50 SE features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Honor 50 SE has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% bigger battery size. Honor 50 SE takes a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.