Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 global score. Google Pixel 4 XL is better than Honor 50 SE, it must be noted that it's also older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little faster CPU than Honor 50 SE, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better looking display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Honor 50 SE takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Honor 50 SE has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Honor 50 SE counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.