Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is much better than Honor 50 SE's global score of 73.7. The Google Pixel 4a is an older and a little thicker device than the Honor 50 SE, but Google was able to make it lighter anyway. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Honor 50 SE has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 SE also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a features a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density.
Google Pixel 4a's storage for games and applications is very similar to Honor 50 SE's one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage. Honor 50 SE counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
The Honor 50 SE has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.