Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is better than the Honor 50 SE's general score of 73.7. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should give identical operating system features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter than Honor 50 SE, and they were released with only 7 months difference.
The Honor 50 SE features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 SE also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has as much storage for applications and games as the Honor 50 SE one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Honor 50 SE takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Honor 50 SE counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.