Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than Honor 50 SE, with an 82.7 score against 73.7. Although it's the best we compare here, LG G8X ThinQ's body is older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Honor 50 SE. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Honor 50 SE, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. LG G8X ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better display density.
The Honor 50 SE takes much clearer photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
LG G8X ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor 50 SE and the LG G8X ThinQ feature extremely similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.