Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than the Honor 50 SE's 73.7 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is lighter and a little thinner than Honor 50 SE, even though it was released 3 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch of display.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Honor 50 SE, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Honor 50 SE has longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 SE features a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a much higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.