Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 global score. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is notably thinner but heavier than the Honor 50 SE, and both of them were only released 3 months apart. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little faster processing unit than Honor 50 SE. Both have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because it has a better resolution of 1892 x 2688px, a bigger screen and a quite higher pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2's storage capacity to install applications and games is very similar to the Honor 50 SE one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 50 SE captures better photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little better battery duration than Honor 50 SE, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.