Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than Honor 50 SE, having an 87.1 score against 73.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is a lot newer than Honor 50 SE's, although it's just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Honor 50 SE has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Honor 50 SE, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has just a bit better camera than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels and a worse video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better images in low light environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit longer battery life than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.