Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is a bit better than Honor 50 SE, having a 77.6 score against 73.7. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z3 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features. Motorola Moto Z3's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Honor 50 SE, although it was released many years before.
Honor 50 SE features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 SE also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto Z3 has a little sharper display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto Z3 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50 SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Honor 50 SE features better battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Honor 50 SE counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.