Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 is just a bit better than the Honor 50 SE, having a 79.6 score against 73.7. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A30 is incredibly older than the Honor 50 SE, it's body is just a little bit thinner and lighter. Honor 50 SE and Galaxy A30 both feature quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy A30 has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
Galaxy A30 counts with more storage to store more apps and games than Honor 50 SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Honor 50 SE has a little better processing power than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 SE also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A30's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Honor 50 SE. The Honor 50 SE shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.