Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is much better than Honor 50 SE, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 73.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version. Galaxy A31's construction is a bit lighter than Honor 50 SE, although it's a little thicker and was released just a bit over a year before.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a slightly better display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Honor 50 SE features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 SE also has 4 GB more RAM.
Honor 50 SE shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A31, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Galaxy A31 features a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Honor 50 SE, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A31 has longer battery life than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.