Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is much better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is just a bit thinner and lighter than Honor 50 SE, even though it was released many years before. The Honor 50 SE features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 SE also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. Honor 50 SE takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A50 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50's battery lifetime is just as good as the Honor 50 SE one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.