Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Honor 50 SE, getting a 91.3 score against 73.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Honor 50 SE were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is just a little lighter but a bit thicker than Honor 50 SE. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Honor 50 SE has Android 11, so it gives a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Honor 50 SE counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 SE also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little greater count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better memory for apps and games than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little longer battery performance than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.