Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the Honor 50 SE, getting a 76.9 score against 73.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A70 is a just a little bit lighter phone than the Honor 50 SE, but both are equally thin.
Galaxy A70 features a screen that is very similar to the screen in Honor 50 SE, because although the Galaxy A70 has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Honor 50 SE counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor 50 SE also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A70 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Honor 50 SE shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited situations, they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.