Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is much better than Honor 50 SE, with an 87.7 score against 73.7. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy M51 has older 10 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version. Galaxy M51 is an older, heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than Honor 50 SE. Honor 50 SE and Galaxy M51 count with really similar screens, and although the Galaxy M51 has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, they both have the same display pixels density.
Galaxy M51 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Honor 50 SE counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 SE also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor 50 SE shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a way more mega pixels camera.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 75 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.