Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Honor 50 SE, with a general score of 98.9 against 73.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older, a bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than Honor 50 SE. Both phones we are comparing here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Honor 50 SE has Android 11, providing some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Honor 50 SE, because it has a quite bigger display, more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processing unit than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better videos and photos than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.