Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than the Honor 50 SE, having a 79.5 score against 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 construction has the same thickness than the Honor 50 SE, but it's somewhat lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a little more vivid screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Honor 50 SE counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. Honor 50 SE takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Note7 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Honor 50 SE, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. Honor 50 SE counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.