Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than the Honor 50 SE's 73.7 general score. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide the user the same OS features. Galaxy S10 is a lighter cellphone than the Honor 50 SE, but both have the same thickness.
Galaxy S10 has a bit better processing unit than Honor 50 SE. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S10 has a much better looking display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
The Honor 50 SE takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a lot tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy S10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Honor 50 SE has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.