Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Honor 50 SE, having a general score of 98 against 73.7. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is an older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Honor 50 SE.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than Honor 50 SE, because it has a greater screen density, a quite bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit superior processing unit than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture for better low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.