Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is much better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Honor 50 SE counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Honor 50 SE, and although they both have a 108 megapixels back facing camera, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos. Galaxy S22 Ultra and Honor 50 SE have very similar memory to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery performance than Honor 50 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.