Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than Honor 50 SE, with a 79.5 score against 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a lighter phone than Honor 50 SE, but both of them are equally thin. The Galaxy S7 has a much more vibrant screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Honor 50 SE has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Honor 50 SE features a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Honor 50 SE has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Honor 50 SE takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.