Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is much better than Honor 50 SE, having a global score of 81.7 against 73.7. The Galaxy S8 body has the same thickness than the Honor 50 SE, but it is lighter. The Galaxy S8 has a sharper screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S8 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 SE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Honor 50 SE features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 SE also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Honor 50 SE takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a camera with a much better resolution. Honor 50 SE counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.