Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 385 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 score. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Honor 50 SE has Android 11. Although it's the best in this review, Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, thicker and incredibly heavier phone than the Honor 50 SE.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a processor that's just as good as the processor in Honor 50 SE, and although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater storage to install applications and games than Honor 50 SE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery duration than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Honor 50 SE takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, it also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.