Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Honor 50 SE's 73.7 global score. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must note that it's also an older, a lot thicker and heavier device. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
Honor 50 SE features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 SE also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density.
Honor 50 SE captures greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor 50 SE, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 1% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.