Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is much better than the Honor 50 SE's overall score of 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Honor 50 SE, although it was released just 11 months before. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit superior processor than Honor 50 SE. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more vivid display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a bit higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Honor 50 SE takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in low light situations and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Honor 50 SE, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Honor 50 SE has improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.