Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has an overall score of 84.4, which is better than Honor 50 SE's global score of 73.7. Xiaomi 14 Ultra is a incredibly newer cellphone than Honor 50 SE, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Xiaomi 14 Ultra has newer 14 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version, providing the user some additional features and some performance improvements.
The Honor 50 SE counts with a much greater processing power than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra counts with a way better screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Honor 50 SE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra features a little bit better camera than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra has longer battery life than Honor 50 SE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.