Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 has an overall score of 87.5, which is better than Honor 50 SE's general score of 73.7. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F4 has 12 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11 version, providing the user some extra features and some performance improvements. Xiaomi Poco F4 is a newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Honor 50 SE, although it's also a little bit heavier.
Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a sharper screen than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Honor 50 SE, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Honor 50 SE shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 SE also counts with a way more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has as much memory for applications and games as the Honor 50 SE one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a bit superior battery life than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.