Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the Honor 50 SE's 73.7 score. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has the older 10 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11. The Xiaomi Poco M3 design is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than the Honor 50 SE.
Honor 50 SE features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 SE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco M3 and Honor 50 SE count with quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco M3 has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Honor 50 SE, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Honor 50 SE takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.