Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is much better than the Honor 50 SE's 73.7 score. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Honor 50 SE. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has 10 version and Honor 50 SE has Android 11.
Honor 50 SE features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 SE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better display than Honor 50 SE, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch of screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Honor 50 SE, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has greater battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures clearer photos and videos than Honor 50 SE, although it has a lower video quality and a back-facing camera with way less MP, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.