Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Silver | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2388 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a general score of 76.6, which is a bit better than the Honor 50 SE's score of 73.7. These phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has the older 10 version while Honor 50 SE has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 design is older, thicker and just a little bit heavier than Honor 50 SE.
The Honor 50 SE counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 SE also has 5 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a screen that's very similar to the display in Honor 50 SE, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display density.
Honor 50 SE features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Honor 50 SE counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has greater battery lifetime than Honor 50 SE, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.