Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Honor 50's 74.5 global score. The iPhone X is a a little bit lighter device than Honor 50, but both are equally thin. The Apple iPhone X counts with a better screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436.
IPhone X counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Honor 50, because it has more internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X features a little faster processing unit than Honor 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Honor 50 shoots much better videos and photos than iPhone X, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited environments and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Honor 50 has a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.