Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 390 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a global score of 82, which is much better than Honor 50's 74.5 general score. Although it's the best in this comparison review, iPhone XR is a notably older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier device than Honor 50. The iPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid screen than Honor 50, although it has a little bit lower pixel density, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a little bit smaller display.
The iPhone XR counts with a little better performance than Honor 50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Honor 50 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Honor 50 captures much better videos and photos than iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Honor 50 counts with a much better battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.