Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than Honor 50, getting a general score of 80.2 against 74.5. Google Pixel is a much older and somewhat thicker phone than Honor 50, but Google was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Pixel features a little bit better looking screen than Honor 50, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Honor 50 and the Google Pixel feature really similar memory for apps and games, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. Honor 50 has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Honor 50 has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Honor 50 takes way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Honor 50 also has a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.