Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than Honor 50, getting a overall score of 78.8 against 74.5. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give you the same operating system features. The Google Pixel 3a is a incredibly older and just a little bit thicker phone than Honor 50, but Google was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
The Google Pixel 3a features a little sharper screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each inch in the screen. The Honor 50 features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has more RAM memory.
Honor 50 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP. Honor 50 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Honor 50 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.