Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Honor 50's overall score of 74.5. Google Pixel 4 is an older and just a bit thicker phone than Honor 50, but Google made it a little lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better looking display than Honor 50, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit better CPU than Honor 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Honor 50 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 50 also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back facing camera.
Honor 50 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Honor 50 features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.