Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a global score of 82.9, which is much better than Honor 50's score of 74.5. Google Pixel 4a's body is lighter than Honor 50, although it is just a little thicker and was released around 10 months before. Both phones we are comparing here use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding operating system features.
Honor 50 has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better display than Honor 50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a quite greater pixels count per inch of screen.
Honor 50 has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Honor 50 also counts with a much better resolution back camera. The Google Pixel 4a's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Honor 50's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 37 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.