Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the Honor 50's general score of 74.5. Both devices in our current comparison include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Honor 50 were only released with a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is just a little bit thicker but also a little bit lighter.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid display than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Honor 50 has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor 50 has a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor 50 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera. The Google Pixel 4a 5G's memory to store more apps and games is just as good as the Honor 50 one, they have equal internal memory capacity.
Honor 50 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.