Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a general score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than Honor 50's general score of 74.5. Although the Nokia 9 PureView is way older and a little bit thicker than Honor 50, it's body is still just a little lighter. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little better hardware performance than Honor 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better looking screen than Honor 50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. The Honor 50 features a very superior camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Honor 50 also counts with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Nokia 9 PureView and Honor 50 count with quite similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Honor 50 has superior battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3320mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.