Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Cyber shade |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a global score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Honor 50's score of 74.5. Despite being the best phone in this review, we must tell that it is also older, heavier and a lot thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 3S has 9.0 Pie version while Honor 50 has Android 11.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster processor than Honor 50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better looking display than Honor 50, because although it has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Honor 50, because it has more internal memory. Honor 50 features a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 also counts with higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much more MP back camera.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery duration than Honor 50, because it has a 16% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.