Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is better than the Honor 50's general score of 74.5. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS, so they should count with identical operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older and a little thicker cellphone than the Honor 50, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit lighter anyway.
Honor 50 has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has 4 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a bit better looking screen than Honor 50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite better pixel density.
The Honor 50 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 also has a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A51 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Honor 50 features a little better battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.