Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is way better than Honor 50's general score of 74.5. The Galaxy A52 is an a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the Honor 50. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better looking display than Honor 50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Honor 50 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor 50 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52's camera is just as good as the camera in Honor 50, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A52 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Honor 50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit better battery duration than Honor 50, because it has a 5 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.