Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-06-25 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than the Honor 50, having a 91.3 score against 74.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Honor 50 has Android 11, counting with some nice extra features. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Honor 50.
Honor 50 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Honor 50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit better pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in Honor 50, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much less MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Honor 50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.