Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-25 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 17.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is better than Honor 50's overall score of 74.5. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also way older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a display that's just as good as the Honor 50 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch of screen.
Honor 50 features a bit better processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor 50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Honor 50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Honor 50 has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Honor 50 also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.